9/6/2023 0 Comments Negative seo checkerAt this point I would also like to point out that quite a few penalty removal enquiries that we have dealt with were blatantly the direct product of cheap SEO yet the site owner was more than happy to point the finger at negative SEO from one of their competitors. In total, we have seen clear cut cases of 5 negative SEO attacks in the last 6 months. Sadly, neither is currently provable in a court of law (but I’m working on it) and until it is, I refuse to be reduced to that level of action and re-action. In both cases, a little investigation has revealed the source of the negative SEO attack. In the last month alone, not only has one of our clients been clearly affected, but our own site has also been targeted. However, in the last 6 months, we have started seeing a different cause for these type of spammy links. You know the type, £250/month service for 1000 directory submissions, 100 comments on PR5 sites etc… ![]() ![]() Simply put, it was caused by a business owner attempting to get SEO work at cheap prices. The common denominator of all this spam was the cause of the penalty. Comments spam, forums spam, directory spam, pingback spam, profile spam, hijacked/injected spam and every other type of spam possible. Penalties caused by, gently put, less than organic SEO practices. Up to date, we have managed over 170 penalty recovery clients. The demand has increased dramatically and several years ago, we employed Kate Brownhill, who in my opinion, is one of the top penalty recovery experts in the UK. ![]() Here at Reboot Online a large portion of our workload involves dealing with Google penalty recovery cases. Negative SEO a Shocking but Inevitable Epidemic?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |